[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depleted Uranium SG
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Depleted Uranium SG
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:08:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 14:12:22 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <nYlsiC.A.ImB.jmXSDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: robert heidlebaugh <rheidlebaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've been there. DON'T TRY IT!!! Depleated uranium is very hard, but it is
flamable and will burn while drilling it with out cooling. You could easly
get a lung of uranium oxide and " gulf war sindrome". NOT GOOD.
Robert H
--
> From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:29:29 -0600
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Depleted Uranium SG
> Resent-From: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Resent-Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:30:58 -0600 (MDT)
>
> Original poster: "Mike" <mike.marcum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is probably the stupidest idea yet, but has anyone thought of
> using depleted uranium for sparkgap electrodes? Figured if it was one
> of the heaviest stable elements in the periodic table it won't
> melt/corrode as easily as tungsten at high power. Does it have crappy
> RF properties like steel? Probably a moot point in a few years when
> DRSSTC's take over, but still kinda courious.
>
> Mike
>
>