[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDT Wire
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: GDT Wire
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:54:33 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 18:53:47 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <VDuL9C.A.APF.YQyQDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Jan Wagner <jwagner@xxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Alexander Turkin" <alex_3@xxxxxxx>
I'm going to make a SSTC with such a construction that the length of
the wire from the chips to the 1st GDT is not equal to the length of
the wire to the 2nd GDT. My question is: will it affect operation of SSTC?
Not much at all, unless the length difference is very significant,
like, many tens of centimetres. Sounds like you're using one chip to
drive two paralleled GDT's - even that should be fine. Just try to
generally keep the wiring paths (current loops) outside of the GDT
cores as short as possible, and twist wire pairs together to reduce
"leakage" i.e. series inductance. Although for a lowish drive
frequency (for example <300kHz) all these extra precautions are
pretty much unnecessary...
regards,
- Jan