[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depleted Uranium SG
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: Depleted Uranium SG
 
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:34:19 -0600
 
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
 
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
 
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
 
- Resent-date: Sat,  1 Oct 2005 15:34:47 -0600 (MDT)
 
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Resent-message-id: <p43ZpD.A.NgC.2DwPDB@poodle>
 
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Original poster: David Speck <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mike,
Uranium metal is very flammable when finely divided.
I read a great chapter in one of the books on the making of the first 
atomic weapons.  They were having difficulty attaching some component 
to a piece of uranium because of the hard natural protective oxide 
coating it forms upon exposure to air.  One of the machinists had the 
bright idea of using a sand blaster to clean off the oxide.  The 
instant the blast hit the metallic uranium, a great shower of white 
hot sparks erupted.  Needless to say, that approach was abandoned.
I'm not even crazy about using thoriated tungsten rods in my RSGs 
because of the small amount of radioactive oxide dust that would be 
liberated, so I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to use uranium for the gaps.
Dave
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Mike" <mike.marcum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
This is probably the stupidest idea yet, but has anyone thought of 
using depleted uranium for sparkgap electrodes? Figured if it was 
one of the heaviest stable elements in the periodic table it won't 
melt/corrode as easily as tungsten at high power. Does it have 
crappy RF properties like steel? Probably a moot point in a few 
years when DRSSTC's take over, but still kinda courious.
Mike