[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depleted Uranium SG
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Depleted Uranium SG
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:34:19 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:34:47 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <p43ZpD.A.NgC.2DwPDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: David Speck <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mike,
Uranium metal is very flammable when finely divided.
I read a great chapter in one of the books on the making of the first
atomic weapons. They were having difficulty attaching some component
to a piece of uranium because of the hard natural protective oxide
coating it forms upon exposure to air. One of the machinists had the
bright idea of using a sand blaster to clean off the oxide. The
instant the blast hit the metallic uranium, a great shower of white
hot sparks erupted. Needless to say, that approach was abandoned.
I'm not even crazy about using thoriated tungsten rods in my RSGs
because of the small amount of radioactive oxide dust that would be
liberated, so I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to use uranium for the gaps.
Dave
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: "Mike" <mike.marcum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
This is probably the stupidest idea yet, but has anyone thought of
using depleted uranium for sparkgap electrodes? Figured if it was
one of the heaviest stable elements in the periodic table it won't
melt/corrode as easily as tungsten at high power. Does it have
crappy RF properties like steel? Probably a moot point in a few
years when DRSSTC's take over, but still kinda courious.
Mike