[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Magnifying Tesla Coils
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Magnifying Tesla Coils
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:15:29 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:18:21 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <Zg-IZD.A.d-H.rCCfDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Sebastian Fischetti" <QuantumStrings@xxxxxxx>
Thinking along these lines, then, couldn't you (theoretically) create
as many primary-secondary drivers as you wanted, connect them all to
the same top load, and connect a single tertiary coil to that top
load? I don't know if this would actually sum up the individual
voltages generated by each individual secondary, I'm sure it has to
be more complicated then that. Actually, couldn't you just connect
as many coils as you wanted? That is, have a secondary connected to
a tertiary connected to a quaternary and so on...I'm just putting
these ideas out there for you guys to comment on, I haven't at all
thought these out through (nor do I think I would be able to, with my
limited knowledge of the subject). I know that a magnifying coil
with two secondary-primary pairs could work, as demonstrated in the
site I mentioned in my original E-Mail
(<http://www.tesla-coil.com/Magnifier.htm>http://www.tesla-coil.com/Magnifier.htm).
I guess in theory there would be a limit as to how many
primary-secondaries you could squeeze together due to the interaction
of one primary with its non-respective adjacent secondary...Once
again, just an idea, I've no idea whether or not this would actually
be true. Thanks!
-Sebbie