[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Toroid ballast design
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Toroid ballast design
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:18:30 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:18:33 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <sQz7YD.A.Wv.ojoeDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I dont know where these cores saturate and if 24600 gauss is no
problem, the fewer number of turns will mean less winding loss.
I've heard that 17000 gauss is about where transformer iron starts to
saturate. Commercial transformer designs seem to aim for about this
17kG peak figure. 24600 seems a bit "Out there" :-o
One handy rule of thumb I heard when designing gapped ballasts is
that gapping the core doesn't change the volt-second capability. (To
a first order at least.) So the number of turns you need to avoid
saturation is the same as for an ungapped transformer. Hence a good
starting point with a gapped variac core would be "The same number of
turns as the variac had".
I guess with two stacked cores, you only need half the number of
turns, or is it 1/sqrt(2)?
Steve Conner
http://www.scopeboy.com/