[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:01:15 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:02:36 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <O52y9D.A.7DD.zENeDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi Dmitry,
> I think you are missing my point.
and i think you`re missing my one :-D
> The idea is not to characterized
> the variac, but to test the statement that the leakage inductance of
> the variac causes the phase of the charging waveform to change as the
> voltage output of the variac is brought up.
i don`t need to test anything - everything can be predicted theoretically,
to do that we have to know the variac parameters, as load parameters
are already known (more or less).
> So lets give
> Lets measure
> Then we will know :o))
ok - then everything is in your hands :-)
-----
The solution to no primary hits lay in getting rid of the primary!
This is no joke either.
20-06-96 (c) Richard Hull, TCBOR