[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Theory of LTR
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Theory of LTR
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:01:01 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:02:25 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <eoyOYD.A.2CD.wENeDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Original poster: "Bob (R.A.) Jones" <a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi all,
> I recently tried a different direction on the theoretical the optimum
> primary C (Cp) for a given inductive ballast (L)
is it only for nst using case? coz i for example choose the ballast
for the Cp and the current i need, not vice-versa.
-----
The solution to no primary hits lay in getting rid of the primary!
This is no joke either.
20-06-96 (c) Richard Hull, TCBOR