[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:03:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:04:44 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <QS7Io.A.WaC.rEpdDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 1) What decides whether a cap is LTR or STR? The
> answer is the leakage inductance of the transformer.
> Now in a NST that is built in, but a pig has
> practically none so you need to provide your own
> external ballast. So, it is not the pig itself that
> determines whether the cap is LTR or STR, but the
> ballast. (And the transformer turns ratio too, I
> suppose.)
you guys are making your life more difficult by yourselves, you create
unnecessary questions by yourselves - the ballast should be at the
secondary side of the transformer - it`s just that simple. discussions
on this topic started to appear as early as 96 (if you interested) :-)
-----
The solution to no primary hits lay in getting rid of the primary!
This is no joke either.
20-06-96 (c) Richard Hull, TCBOR