[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: LTR vs. STR for pigs was Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:20:56 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:21:11 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <l3jge.A.q4H.edSdDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 11/11/05 12:50:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
- if my memory serves me well, John Freay said, that while
increasing bps from 120 till 240, the streamers length if not
increasing, then at least not decreasing/visibly decreasing
I may have said something like that at some point, but it may
have been based on a non-sync gap where it was harder to
determine bang size, etc. But it seems
from most of my tests that 120 bps is better for making
longer streamers for a given input power.
Regarding Greg Leyh's coil, it's possible that if he had
reconfigured the coil for a larger bang size, then it may
have given best results at 120 bps, and it may have also
become more "efficient".
John