[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LTR with pole pigs
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: LTR with pole pigs
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:30:12 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:30:49 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <LDUh0.A.00B.H0JdDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> LTR operation for a pole pig is determined by the
> ballast setting.
OK, so you agree with what I said.
> I've
> personally used an LTR cap on a pole pig, and in
> short, it rocks.
Cool! That must have been one seriously big cap. What
was the capacitance, ballast inductance, power level
etc?
> Lower the breakrate, increase the tank cap size, and
> move to LTR.
The coil I'm talking about is a DRSSTC, so LTR/STR
don't have any meaning, as far as I know. But larger
capacitances do seem to work somewhat better. They
give a higher primary current, so you can achieve the
same spark length with a shorter RF burst.
That makes it more efficient, because if the burst is
too long it mostly heats and fattens the spark rather
than lengthening it.
Steve Conner
http://www.scopeboy.com/