[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coax cable , blumlein, etc.
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: coax cable , blumlein, etc.
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:32:31 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:33:49 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <BJJ9BB.A.UpC.MlncDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Gerry,
On 8 Nov 2005, at 21:39, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> Do you have any detail of your experience like.
>
> 1. Where were the enormous voltages and how high do you estimate they
> were??
The "safety" gap was set wide - about 20% wider than the main gap,
the sparks were jumping with ease and there were plenty of them. The
energy was low indicating that the primary cap was not the source -
it was effectively shunted by the main gap. I've no doubt residual
energy in the transformer was a contributor but the gap firing was
generating frequencies that were bringing things into the
transmission line realm.
2. Did you have any terminations in your cable?? series
> resistance at the SG end, or RC to ground termination at the
> transformer end??
I did have an RC filter of sorts at the main gap. The resistors were
wirewound 25W types so they were inductive to a degree. However, the
lines would have been contributing considerably more inductance.
3. What kind of transformer died??
It was a 12kV/60mA NST - standard.
4. What do you
> think the mechanism was??
I think the system between the main gap and transformer was behaving
like an unterminated line. Poor to no matching termination. I didn't
repeat the expt for the benefit of the scope. Too poor.
Malcolm