[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: option 1 or option 2.....
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: option 1 or option 2.....
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:31:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:32:58 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <nuMFCD.A.TBH.RWTcDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Henry Hallam" <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
p.s. why is the voltage of the entire MMC (3KV * 8 = 24000 / 5
strings = 4800V??) only 4800 volts when the peak voltage of the xfrm
is 14140V?
thanks
Adding strings in parallel doesn't decrease the voltage rating. So
your MMC is rated for 24kVDC which is expensive and overkill unless
you're intending to put hundreds of hours on it. Generally good MMC
caps can be used at a tank circuit voltage equal to the DC rating,
although you can get away with over-running them even more than that!
Henry