[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PFC Question
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PFC Question
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:15:37 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:17:04 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <nBoft.A.ExG.jg6bDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"> Easy. The transformer has very close to unity coupling factor so
> the leakage inductance is close to zero. Do a Google search on those
> terms for a better explanation.
>
> Ed
In an ideal world yes, one would like a variac to have perfect
coupling between all turns. Due to its required geometry however it
can't. The turns are spaced out in a single layer around a toroidal
core. Closest to unity coupling is only obtained by having all
windings occupying the same space, a physical impossibility but one
you can get close to with a single bobbin'd transformer wound on an E-
I core or a potcore with interleaved windings. In the same breath
it's worth saying that even interleaving has its problems - the
better the coupling obtained between primary and secondary turns the
worse becomes the coupling of each winding to itself.
Malcolm"
I guess your objection is based on my excessive use of
superlatives. Perhaps I should have said "high coupling factor" and
"low leakage inductance". I guess I could measure the inductance
between the brush and the two shorted ends of one and get a better
idea, but I've never done that.
Ed