[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using HV COAX without stripping the shield
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Using HV COAX without stripping the shield
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:59:52 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:01:49 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <rjdFQD.A.IwC.2apaDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Gerry,
On 3 Nov 2005, at 8:40, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi All,
>
> It has been mentioned in the group in the past that there can be a
> high frequency resonance when using a coax cable such as RG8U to
> connect the HV from a PIG to the TC where the PIG is remoted from the
> TC. This resonance can cause a higher voltage standing wave on the
> PIG end of the coax. Dr R has suggested stripping the outer braid of
> the coax to minimize the transmission line effect, It seems like to
> me that doing so changes the characteristic impedance of the cable and
> doesn't really eliminate the problem.
I agree, and have noted problems I encountered in the past with long
leads of any sort.
Malcolm
> I was wondering if anyone has experimented with adding a series RC
> termination to the pig end of the coax to effectively terminate the
> coax. The C could be a string of C's to get adequate HV capabilities
> and the R would be 50ohms if the shield wasn't removed or say 300 ohms
> if the shield was removed. The RC time constant would be set to be
> higher than the resonant frequency of the TC and yet low enough to
> effectively terminate the coax for the high frequencies where the coax
> length would resonant.
>
> Gerry R.
>
>
>