[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Receiver Coil ..........success?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Receiver Coil ..........success?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:53:51 -0700
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:55:17 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <pLfcPD.A.lIC.Tg8ZDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Gary Peterson" <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
. . . When it's On IZJ is the sign of my 181.167 kHz beacon. . .
. . . . I have no plans to do anything under Part 5 as I have a
lousy location here. . . .
Thanks for the detailed description of your beacon, that's exactly
what I was looking for. I'm planning to build a Part 15 compliant
beacon myself and am wondering if you could share the circuit diagram
and parts layout. In addition to a Part 15 radio beacon I also plan
to build a Part 15 compliant Tesla coil transmitter that uses a
nearly identical driver circuit. Both transmitters will be designed
to operate on the precisely the same frequency, around 165 kHz. The
radio antenna is to be a 49-foot tall vertical (including tophat
radius) with an 8-foot high counterpoise, as large in diameter as
possible (on the order of 150 feet). The loading coil is to have an
aspect ratio of about 1:1 and be wound with AWG 22. A variometer
will be used for tuning. AWG 22 will also be used for the TC
transmitter secondary.
The transmitter is solid state . . . Uses a crystal oscillator at 32
x the output frequency, a CD4024 divide by 32 circuit, a CD4007
buffer amplifier driving four Siliconix VN66AF "power" fets.
Am I correct in understanding that the four VN66AFs are connected in parallel?
That article was written long, long ago . . . There is probably
a paper copy around somewhere . . . if I can find a copy I'll . . .
mail it to you.
That would be great, but don't go to too much trouble. Your
recommendations have fit the bill precisely.
Not sure if I answered all of your questions, and probably none
to your satisfaction. . . .
On the contrary, your insights are tremendous.
Gary
Ed