[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: good scopes for coiling
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: good scopes for coiling
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:56:41 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:57:35 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <bqXSlC.A.x3B.dh8iCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 18 May 2005, at 9:58, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Paul B. Brodie" <pbbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi,
> Terry has the plans for the Tesla Coil Tuner that I think basically
> does what Malcolm has described here. Karl Lindheimer posted a note
> earlier about using the TCT with the URL. I will repeat it. The
> schematic and directions are located here:
>
> http://hot-streamer.com/TeslaCoils/Misc/TCT/TCT.htm
>
> It is a 555 oscillator with a bi-directional LED. I downloaded the
> plans and directions and just happen to have all of the parts in my
> junk bin, except for the 10K audio taper pot with switch. I plan to
> get one of these at Radio Shack tomorrow. One thing I was
> contemplating doing differently is use a micro-ammeter I have on hand
> instead of the LED. Won't this give a better indication in place of
> trying to judge the brightness of an LED?? Is this so, or am I missing
> something? Maybe I can use the LED and the meter? What do you think?
> If I keep getting sidetracked with these projects, I'll never complete
> my TC! ô¿ô Paul Think Positive
I assume you will have some form of HF rectification to drive the
meter?
Malcolm
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: good scopes for coiling
>
> Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On 17 May 2005, at 11:45, Tesla list wrote:
>
> > Original poster: "Mercurus2000" <mercurus2000@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > So there is no electronic way of measuring the resonance of a >
> secondary without complicated or expensive electronics? -----
> Original > Message ----- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> To: >
> <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 3:59 PM Subject: Re: >
> good scopes for coiling
>
> I'm sure a way can be devised that doesn't require use of an
> oscilloscope and sniffer probe although that is probably the best
> option. Connecting a signal generator which can supply some current (a
> buffered 555 e.g.) to the secondary base in series with a resistor
> would allow monitoring of current through the resistor with a LED in
> parallel by sensing the voltage across it. That will interfere to a
> far lesser degree with correct operation of the secondary. I see no
> reason why it shouldn't work although you can probably expect several
> lesser peaks besides the fundamental. In my experience, monitoring
> base current and finding the peak doesn't coincide exactly with
> maximum Vs although it gets close.
>
> Malcolm
>
> > Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > On 13 May 2005, at 23:02, Tesla list wrote:
> >
> > > Original poster: "Mercurus2000" <mercurus2000@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Couldn't you take like you said a 555 timer, connect the
> pulsing > > squarewave output to a TC secondary, then connect a
> diode to the > > topload and connect a digital voltmeter to the
> diode and get a idea > of > the resonant frequency? Adam -----
> Original Message ----- From: > "Tesla > list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: > Friday, May 13, > 2005 10:49 AM
> Subject: Re: good scopes for coiling > > In a word, no, not if you
> are after accuracy. Anything you connect > directly to the secondary
> is going to boost its puny capacitance out > of sight. > > Malcolm >
> > > > > Original poster: Karl Lindheimer <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Hi Keith, > > > > A scope and/or frequency generator
> can be quite helpful in Tesla > Coil > duty, and for just about
> any other project that will come > along. > Since I am on a low
> "fixed budget" as it were, I built a > 555 timer > waveform
> generator for about $8.00 total. I used an > inexpensive >
> multi-meter for several years before snagging a > Tektronics 265B
> scope > for under $100 on Ebay. This scope is the > best addition
> to my test > bench in many years, and continues to > impress. My
> Tek scope is rugged > and parts are still obtainable > from junked
> scopes. > > Hope that the above helps, > > Karl > > On > May 12,
> 2005, at 10:32 PM, Tesla list wrote: > > >Original poster: >
> "keith" <keith.cc@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >I'm looking to buy a scope >
> and/or frequency generator for coiling > and >general use, but I
> > don't really have any idea about > manufacturers/models >etc
> what > are some good ones to look for? I've > read that the older
> tube > >scopes are better than modern solid state > ones for the
> stressful > >environments generally encountered in high > voltage
> work, and > given that >I'm still new to coiling/hv devices, >
> something that > has a good chance of >surviving a few careless >
> errors/poorly > designed experiments would be good. >Relatively
> low > cost would > also be nice. Thanks. > >Keith C > > > > > >
>
>
>