[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting back into coiling
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Getting back into coiling
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:46:50 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:48:08 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <zcJxv.A.oc.V5iiCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Bob (R.A.) Jones" <a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Nowadays, synchronous gaps are used very well with NSTs and larger capacitors:
http://www.richieburnett.co.uk/indkick.html#kick
They are generally known as LTR coils since the primary capacitor is
larger than is used in the resonant case. The precise timing of the sync
gap allows larger capacitors to be used and proportionally larger output.
Have I got this correct. For the conditions described in the link
The peak firing voltage is 2x the peak oc output voltage and the peak
output voltage is almost three times the oc output voltage???
Robert (R. A.) Jones
A1 Accounting, Inc., Fl
407 649 6400