[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tesla Coil Information and copyrights
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Tesla Coil Information and copyrights
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 15:17:50 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:18:36 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <7WaVVB.A.tuG.qIofCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: Tesla Coil Information and copyrights
> Original poster: "Mercurus2000" <mercurus2000@xxxxxxx>
>
> I just checked my "Strange Stories from Electrical Experimenter Magazine
> 1917-1919 by Lindsay books there is no "Used with permission" with the
> reprint articles, it just gives the date for the original copyright and
> dates of the Magazine articles and a "Reprinted by Lindsay Publications
Inc"
> so there isn't gonna be a problem. Their book doesn't even have a
copyright
> on it, but scanning that would be unethical, since you can still purchase
> this book from them.
You might give Lindsay a call. They might already have scanned images that
you could post. You never know.
With scanning these, like I said, there are many Tesla
> books I have with small articles from Electrical Experimenter with no
"Used
> with permission" labels on any of them.
Just because someone prints something without attribution doesn't mean that
they haven't secured appropriate permissions. There's also a fair amount
of "interpretation" when it comes to small excerpts (as in "fair use").