[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spray enamel vs shellack
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: spray enamel vs shellack
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 18:18:30 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 7 May 2005 18:22:25 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <T5cnJD.A.y7G.AvVfCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Daniel McCauley" <dhmccauley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If you are that concerned over funds, why coat the secondary at all??
Its not really necessary performance wise.
> I suppose what Steven and I
> are looking for are the dielectric and electrical properties of clear
> enamel, since we can't afford much else. Thanks.
> Paul
> Think Positive