[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DC coil without the voltage doubler resoance charge inductor?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: DC coil without the voltage doubler resoance charge inductor?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:47:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 5 May 2005 21:47:12 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <Gc62oD.A.6p.-iueCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "S&JY" <youngsters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Paul,
I'm not Mark, but I believe the inductance of your NST will be so high that
you will not be able to fully charge your primary cap except at very low
break rates. I have used 4 MOT secondaries in series as a charging reactor
with no problems with breakdown. The MOTs need to be mounted on insulators
and separated from each other, of course.
--Steve Y.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: DC coil without the voltage doubler resoance charge inductor?
> Original poster: "Paul B. Brodie" <pbbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Mark,
> I have been considering duplicating your DC resonant charging
configuration
> and have most of the parts required minus the charging reactor. I was
> considering using the secondary of a 15kV NST for this but after reading
> about your experience with the MOT secondary burning out, I have second
> thoughts. I do realize that the NST secondary is designed for 15kV vs. the
> 2000kV of a MOT. What is your opinion about this idea? Thanks.
> Paul
> PS Your previous emails and your web site have been extremely helpful.
> Thanks again.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tesla list" <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 1:21 PM
> Subject: RE: DC coil without the voltage doubler resoance charge inductor?
>
> > Original poster: "Mark Dunn"
<<mailto:mdunn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>mdunn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Jim:
> >
> > I use a DC system with great success. I have a homemade 31 H charging
> > reactor built on a gapped U-100 Ferrite core in series with the d-q
> > diode. Orignally, I used two MOT secondaries in series(15 H ea) but
> > eventually the insulation breaks down on the secondary wire and arcs
> > over in the secondary causing the inductance to drop.
> >
> > I used 1N5408 diodes in series to create the d-q and F-W rectifier(4
> > groups obviously). Each diode is parallelel with a 1.2 megOhm resistor
> > and 1 nF ceramic disk snubber cap(I built these boards a couple years
> > ago so I'd have to dig out the math if you want to know how I arrived
at
> > those values-I know the resistor was picked because I could get a bag
of
> > 200 for $5). My rectifier/power supply design produces + and - DC legs
> > and I have a series of caps to give me 1.5 uF of filtering(reduce
> > ripple) between each DC leg and ground.
> > The filter caps are a series of cheap 450volt electrolytics. These are
> > also paralleled by 1.2 mOhm resistors for bleed down.
> >
> > I think you need the charging reactor(CR) so that the rectifier does
not
> > see a dead short when the spark gap is firing. The CR protects the
> > rectifier because it makes current lag voltage, but that is obvious.
> > Secondly, it protects the rectifier from the RF as you pointed out, but
> > you have a plan to stop that problem(I think - I have no input for you
> > on you RF choke design concept). The additional feature of the CR to
> > double voltage is not an issue for you. By the way, I have the CR on
> > the + DC leg. I always have wondered what protects the -DC leg.
> > Assumed it was because there was no current flow, but RF is always
> > "looking" for ground.
> >
> > Please note I am operating at lower voltages than you. I am using a
> > series of MOT's to produce (2) 3500 VAC legs 180 deg out of phase(net
> > 7000 VAC. After the rectifier I have (2) DC legs, one at +5000 VDC and
> > the other at -5000 VDC. Thus, my Vrrm is only 11,000 volts due to the
> > center tapped type design. Each of my diode strings is thus only (12)
> > diodes. I did use a (20) diode string for the d-q.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > Original poster: "Jim Mora"
<<mailto:jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>jmora@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> > DC Coil: I have acquired all the parts and am in various construction
> > phases of the 11" linear variable rotor 0-500bps spark gap, safety
> > resister banks (tiger strip network) 3 min bleed down from a 4Uf 20KV
> > Maxwell filter/ smoothing cap. 100k 150 watt safety Bang fiberglass
> > stick. I will short and ground this before I go down stream!
> >
> > After pounding my head I see no advantage to a HV charge inductor as I
> > am able to deliver 20365v @ 8k watts easily with my pig 14400 5kva
> > (harder to come by in UK I guess) (in a 10KVA tank)Ultimately, I would
> > like to charge ~ 80nf with up to X^limit? bps and in the 8kva ball
park.
> >
> > The charge inductor seems to be a source of failure for many who have
> > gone down this road? I am thinking of retaining my welder and
ballasting
> > the LV side of the pig.
> >
> > **A few design questions?*** The FW Bridge will be made from 4 stacks
> > of(6)studded 7.5KV each 4.5a diodes part # hvca hdb7.5 9928
(Altronics).
> > These should all have a snubber across them yes? Suggested value, type
?
> >
> > I have a (100) 1N5408 1000v 3or 4 amp doides I was thinking of
> > paralleling 2 and series 40 pairs of these as d-Q is a one nano snubber
> > across each pair prudent?
> >
> > Lastly the RF coming back from the tank to reek havoc and pillage the
> > rectifiers. Searching the achieves, "a simple 1"x 6" open air coil of
> > house wire should act as block" or HV wire wound on a Large torrid such
> > as a TV deflection coil?" Are we buying this? I would appreciate some
> > guidance folks.
> >
> > Thanks Much
> > Jim Mora
> > Ojai, Ca.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>