[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DC coil without the voltage doubler resoance charge inductor?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: DC coil without the voltage doubler resoance charge inductor?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:19:57 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:21:27 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <dspD2C.A.NGE.WYleCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
At 07:23 05/05/05 -0600, you wrote:
After pounding my head I see no advantage to a HV charge inductor
...
I am thinking of retaining my welder and ballasting the LV
side of the pig.
If you are using a filter capacitor (such as the 4uF 20kV unit you
mentioned) then you MUST use a HV charge inductor otherwise the HV filter
cap will discharge through the spark gap. You can use a resistor in place
of the inductor but be prepared to lose 50% of your power.
I have heard of some people using a dual rotary gap that charges the tank
capacitor through one set of contacts and discharges through another, which
might prevent the filter cap discharging as above, but I'm not convinced it
would work efficiently without a charge inductor. There is just no lossless
way to charge one capacitor by connecting it directly to another- so you
would lose 50% of the power in violent arcs at the charging gap.
LV side ballasting only works if there is no DC filter cap (such as on 3
phase DC coils- like Syd Klinge's CAUAC- where no filter cap is required)
Steve Conner