Re: DRSSTC Timing Chart

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Paul B. Brodie" <pbbrodie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Terry,
I really like your chart. It makes it so much clearer what you guys are 
referring to when discussing your DRSSTC's. Thanks.
Paul
Think Positive

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <<mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 11:17 PM
Subject: DRSSTC Timing Chart

> Original poster: Terry Fritz 
<<mailto:teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I made up this DRSSTC timing chart:
>
> 
<http://drsstc.com/~terrell/notes/DRSSTC-Timing-Chart.gif>http://drsstc.com/~terrell/notes/DRSSTC-Timing-Chart.gif
>
> I am running up to 5000 BPS now ;-))  Thus, all this timing stuff gets
> really important!!
>
> It goes off Steve Ward's definitions but adds a bit more detail.  Steve
> said it sounded good to him.
>
> Bang Time becomes Total Bang Time and Burst Time becomes Total Burst
> Time.  But that can be shortened to just the usual Bang Time and Burst Time
> in most cases.  It helps to distinguish between Bang Time and Bang On Time
> when that level of detail is being discussed.
>
> The Burst Off Time has me a little perplexed as to where it should begin
> and the Burst On Time should end?   I think that should be moved to the
> right past the last Bang On Time with the added Bang OFF time too:
>
> 
<http://drsstc.com/~terrell/notes/DRSSTC-Timing-Chart-01.gif>http://drsstc.com/~terrell/notes/DRSSTC-Timing-Chart-01.gif
>
> That "looks" a bit odd, but is "technically" more correct for say
> programming purposes.  It will really get strange when one plays with Bang
> On Time and Bang Off Time during Burst On Time* ;-))  I think you can
> modulate the coil that way for really strange effects ;-))
>
> It is rather hard to abbreviate these things since they have the same
> beginning letters...  Could do like BAonT and BUonT...  Or maybe we could
> agree on T1, T2, T3...  From the magic "chart"??  That is what I have
> started doing.  Anyone who is "up there" enough to care about this stuff
> will get the Tx designations real fast...  I think we are starting to run
> out of room for too many more abbreviations anyway.
>
> Steve Ward said:
>>I would prefer just using the Tx designations on the chart rather than
>>coming up with funny abbreviations and stuff.  Just need to include a
>>link to the holy chart in each email where this information is
>>discussed so that readers can follow along.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>         Terry
>
> *It will really get strange when one plays with T1 and T2 during T4.  -
> Thus the advantage of using Tx abbreviations...
>
>
>