[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wire length LC derivation,
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Wire length LC derivation,
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:02:29 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:07:51 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <WWyLCD.A.KOE.GGlNCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"Just reminder, Medhurst C is NOT the isotropic capacitance of a coil.
In the few paper on coils by Medhurst, that I have read he never
derives
the isotropic capacitance of a coil"
Quite true. However, his formulae for the self-capacitance of grounded
coils have worked very well for me in predicting the self-resonant
frequency of TC secondaries. Usually within a couple of percent, which
is almost to good to be true.
Ed