[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Theory acceptance- was Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Theory acceptance- was Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:58:37 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:59:39 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <uyPVF.A._VG.alHxCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
Jared, Stork et.al.
I think I tried much more politely than most would to explain why your
theories were not being generally accepted and to lay out what would need
to happen before they could be. It's obvious now that doing what would be
necessary to gain acceptance is not as important to you as arguing from the
position of conspiratorially suppressed underdogs. That is your right, but
it remains that you can comply with generally accepted methodology or
"Shtup es in Toches" as they use to say in the old neighborhood.
Matt D.