Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: Paul Nicholson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Stork wrote:

>  Paul's ad hominem attack did not address the validity
>  or verification of any of Jared's assertions.

The faults in Jared's alternative physics have been discussed in
detail - ad nauseum, as you well know.

> It was merely a personal flame attack.

Coilers come to this list for good reliable advice.  Are you
prepared to sit by and watch someone being fed info that we know
is wrong?

Unfortunately Jared doesn't understand the basic EM physics of
electrical resonance, and has built his own alternative and wrong
version, which he now tries to pass off as science.

If something makes no useful sense - it's nonsense.  If it
disagrees with the facts - it's wrong.   If claims are being
sold as scientific but are plainly not following the rules
which that implies, then they are pseudo (pretend) science.

Anyone with any physics knowledge will see straight away the
elementary errors in Jared's claims.  We've explained them
at length but Jared just ignores all criticism and continues
anyway.   I've long since given up trying to explain to Jared
how EM theory applies to coils, (others have tried and failed
too) and there's nothing more we can do except to try to
minimise the confusion which he throws into the discussion
from time to time.
--
Paul Nicholson,
Manchester, UK.
--