[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards the autonomous lifter - electrostatic voltage generators.
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Towards the autonomous lifter - electrostatic voltage generators.
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:14:44 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:18:50 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <iZFqG.A.1X.mJDvCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm very skeptical about this line of argument for the following reasons-
1) Vacuum chambers are HEAVY! So I don't think there's any point in trying
to make an electrostatic generator in a vacuum chamber. The extra weight of
the chamber would probably more than nullify the extra lift due to the
higher output. If I were trying to do this I would start with a high
frequency Cockroft-Walton multiplier running off lithium polymer batteries.
These batteries are used in radio controlled model airplanes and
helicopters, and can easily put out enough power to lift their own weight
when used with an electric motor and propeller.
2) You might be thinking that the whole lifter is designed to fly in space
so no vacuum chamber is needed for the generator. Lifters can't fly in a
vacuum because they work by ion wind. What's more, there's practically no
gravity out there so you don't need lift in the first place!
You could of course supply your own source of propellant, but then you have
just built an ion engine. These have been used on spacecraft for years now:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/exploration/futurespaceflight/ionengines.shtml
If you like, these are the "lifters that made it"
Steve Conner