[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Streamer models used with Terry's new program
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Streamer models used with Terry's new program
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:26:29 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:33:08 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <PMZCs.A.qTH.ipbtCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Jim,
My gut feel is that the model should behave as closely as we can make it to
how we believe streamers really work. What are the switches you have in mind.
Gerry R.
The RC model for the streamer might be modified to account for the
ionization decay. The RC model may be a single RC lumped model or it
may be a ladder network to account for successive streamers.
Dont know if this is a correct way of thinking of streamers (either
partly or completely), but I dont think accurate results will be possible
until a better model for streamer formation is done. The results from
such a model can certainly be compared to actual measurements and maybe
the model can evolve until good matches occur. Seems like you need a
model to develope a model.
I have thought that a useful model might be a lossy transmission line with
a very slow propagation constant. It has the advantage that it's usable
with linear analysis.
The other model (probably more accurate) would be a ladder network with
switches triggered by the charge (which is basically what real streamers are)