[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards the autonomous lifter - electrostatic voltage generators.
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Towards the autonomous lifter - electrostatic voltage generators.
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:03:38 -0600
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:05:27 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <vXb8kD.A.EBC.iTIqCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"Especially useful for our methods might be the
Wimhurst, Wehrsen,
Holtz, or Bonetti machines. I believe these devices
would be able to
deliver more current and therefore greater wattage for
our
application than a Van de Graaff generator."
Not sure about it, but I think that ES motors have a very poor
power/weight ratio, and are probably quite inefficient. Antonio would
know about that. Has anyone calculated the power required to operate a
lifter of useful size?
Apparently, the required voltage is not so high, maybe less than 20 kV,
but the current is high, more than 1 mA for a small device.
It's not simple to build an electrostatic generator that can produce
1 mA, operating in normal air. My most powerful machines produce
just 100 uA, and I can't power a lifter with just this. I tried,
a significant "wind" is produced, but not enough to lift the device.
Maybe if I manage to build a very light one. An electronic power
supply, maybe using a Tesla-coil transformer (air core) and a suitable
rectifier may be more practical than an electrostatic generator,
when weight is the critical factor. A 1 mA electrostatic machine
would weight many kilograms, not counting the motor to power it.
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz