[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Size DOES matter?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Size DOES matter?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:16:34 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:16:44 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <P0CS6C.A.zn.ze-nCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
Conner,
Ive come to this same conclusion over and over again with my
experiments. Its really hard to push that small coil past a given
point. When you move up to a larger coil, its just much easier to get
the longer sparks. I cant say i know of any good reason why a small
coil cant be pushed to produce sparks maybe 5X its secondary length,
but it just doesnt happen that way.
I am a bit surprised that you only got 33"... my coil which is
slightly smaller does 36" in a 2-coil mode and 42" in a magnifier
setup (at about 500 and 600W input power respectively), but the
magnifier has nearly twice as much "secondary" winding ;-).
Efficiency plummets when i try to exceed either of these spark
lengths... looks like that "brick wall" from the old days of
untuned-primary SSTCs has returned, except now the sparks are much
longer than before :-).
Steve Ward