[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 6ga wire vs 1/4 tubing for 900W coil primary?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 6ga wire vs 1/4 tubing for 900W coil primary?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:49:13 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:50:57 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <1L6MSC.A.jBG.Ykv6CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Peter Terren" <pterren@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I would be very surprised if the primary guage has anything to do
with primary strikes. Stranded wire only increases the effective
surface area if there is no way the current can come to the outer
surface of the bundle ie with individually insulated strands ie Llitz
wire. Primary strikes in my view are mostly due to the toroid configuration.
Here is my double toroid with no hint of primary strikes or corona
despite sparks 3 times the secondary length.
http://tesladownunder.com/
Here is my 18 inch diameter coil with a primary made of 14g wire
(much smaller than 6g). Admittedly underperforming but still 5 foot sparks.
http://tesladownunder.com/Tesla_coil_18inch.htm
Peter
Original poster: Timjroche@xxxxxxx
correct me if i'm wrong, but stranded would increase the surface
area(S^2) of the "wire", who
knows...10-fold....100-fold??...depending on # strands... i made a
awg 6-12 (12 strand-6ga) and a awg 4-8 primary and found pimary
strikes to be very much, more freq. and damaging . i atribute it to S^2