[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Capacitor Help Needed
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Capacitor Help Needed
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:05:42 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:15:38 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <usPt2B.A.fiB.4E85CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "father dest" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
there`s no time to answer, but i mentioned 942C16P68K, not the 942C20S68K,
so you are wrong - as for the cost, so for the size. just try to build
mmc rated at 0.1 mf 20 kv for example.
> Original poster: "Gerry Reynolds" <gerryreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The 0.068 uf cap has the same peak current specs as the 0.15 uf cap
> on a per uf basis. The ERS and Irms specs are better than the 0.15uf
> cap on a uf basis. I have bought the 0.068, the 0.10 and the 0.15 uf
> and I believe the cost per uf is almost the same. The main benefit
> for the 0.15uf is density (you can get more cap into the same volume
> with fewer components as with the 0.068uf cap
>
> Gerry R.
>
>
> >Original poster: "father dest" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >guys - why do you use 942C20P15K? it`s more than 2 times worse in
> >C*U/$ than 942C16P68K for example, it has smaller peak & rms current.
> >i know that dU/dt is almost 3 times higher, but for 100-200 khz coils
> >942C16P68K should be fine, and then we just can increase number of
> >caps per string.
---
All I saw was a bright white flash, an explosion like a high-powered
gunshot, and the thick smell of ozone and electrical damage.
(c) Richard Quick 22-01-95 00:13:00