[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 7.1Hz, how the heck did Tesla succeed?

Original poster: "Harold Weiss" <hweiss@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Robert,

I have a friend who used to xmit 50 miles on ground stakes. He and his friend could do telephony on it. They stopped when they found that the Air Force was doing some of the same things. They were worried about setting off one of the missiles at the nearby silos.

So it's not a wild and crazy idea, it works!

David E Weiss


Original poster: robert heidlebaugh <rheidlebaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Charles: in responce to your posting. In 1961 at hill AFB our radar signal
cable was sabotaged .In order to re-establish we used tesla ground wave
propigation to bipass normal cable communications with good results using
30Mhz not ELF. Our antenna was two ground stakes spaced in 1/2 wave length
intervals aligned toward our recieve station and the reciever stakes
oriented 90o to the transmitter site. Actual stake spacing was by trial
tuned for max signal. Our signal strength was well within servicable
limitations. After repair was made normal cable service was restored for
security reasons.
   Robert   H



--


> From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:45:12 -0600
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 7.1Hz, how the heck did Tesla succeed?
> Resent-From: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:16:23 -0600 (MDT)
>
> Original poster: Charles Brush <cfbrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Much of this discussion has focused on EM transmission theory but it > always
> seemed to me that Tesla was focused more on electric or electrostatic
> fields rather than magnetic fields. There is a very interesting web > page
> authored by Oliver Nichelson that talks in depth about this, and he > makes a
> pretty good case for an electrostatic induction based system. No idea > if
> it is any more workable that EM, but it seems fit more with what Telsa > was
> describing (giant terminals, very high potentials, non-Hertzian, etc.):
>
> http://prometheus.al.ru/phisik/wireless.htm
>
> I'd be interested in hearing any comments on this.
>
> Zap!
>
>
> Charles Brush
> http://www.ElectricMuseum.com
>
>