[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:23:57 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:27:27 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <7QjMoC.A.q_.M8S5CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: father dest <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
hi, Malcolm.
> Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi "father dest" (a name would be great ;),
my real name is Dmitry, so you can call me "Father Demetrius" :-)))
just a joke :-)
> Sorry for not replying to this earlier.
better late than never ;-)
but you didn`t answer my central question.
> > now instead of the "minimum bps" question i`m asking about minimum (at
> > practical viewpoint) Vout - does it exist? but maybe it`s just as with
> > bps - do we need some middle value? or we have to increase geometrical
> > sizes and aspire to the maximum voltage? :-)
> Maximum voltage the secondary can withstand without flashing over? I
> would.
why should we go close to the "maximum secondary voltage"? why should
we risk? why we can`t stop at, for example, 150 kv, that imo will
never fry my 20" tall secondary? the question was/still:
"minimum (at practical viewpoint) Vsec - does it exist? but maybe it`s
just as with bps - do we need some middle value?"
-------
All I saw was a bright white flash, an explosion like a high-powered
gunshot, and the thick smell of ozone and electrical damage.
(c) Richard Quick 22-01-95 00:13:00