[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DRSSTC efficiency experiment
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: DRSSTC efficiency experiment
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:09:08 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:10:34 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <1sbmHC.A.M4C.JRH5CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Steve,
Thank for your interesting experiment. If I get
it right, my findings about breakrate are similar
to yours, even if I used a disruptive RSG TC. See
http://www.iki.fi/dncmrc/meas/perf_bps.htm
There I kept the bang size constant and varied
the BPS. Breakrate increase helps to a certain
point. Then a saddlepoint is reached and performance doesn't better anymore.
I don't know about coalescence (I always achieve
it) but also I have got the opinion that higher
breakrate strightens the streamer path thus allowing to reach better.
Best Regards
P.S: I got yesterday an old version of Black
Corsar Orcad 9.1 so now I can start fiddling with
those streamer models using Pspice.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 25. heinäkuuta 2005 01:42
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: DRSSTC efficiency experiment
>
> Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I had a fun Saturday afternoon with my DRSSTC and my new
> wattmeter. I found what I believe to be a few interesting
> things about how well streamers grow with different
> breakrates and burst lengths.
>
> http://www.scopeboy.com/tesla/drsstc/experiment/
>
> I'd be interested to hear what everyone else thinks.
>
> (this was also posted to the TCBOUK mailing list)
>
> Steve Conner
>
>