[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 7.1Hz, how the heck did Tesla succeed?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: 7.1Hz, how the heck did Tesla succeed?
 
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:57:36 -0600
 
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
 
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
 
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
 
- Resent-date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:01:57 -0600 (MDT)
 
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
 
- Resent-message-id: <qKp2MC.A.uVH.0RZ3CB@poodle>
 
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
" >      I'd have to look up his reference but he says that "only a few
 > horsepower" are needed to excite his antenna; I take that to mean
loss.
Ah, I remember that.  You're right, it would take WAY more than "a few
horsepower" to run Wardenclyffe if nobody was loading it.  But the Corum
paper said ~1 megawatt.  Was "few horsepower" about Wardenclyffe or
about
some other unit?"
	I can't remember but think it may have been more general than just
Wardenclyffe.
"But if those total corona/resistive losses at present are in the
megawatts, then a Tesla system with megawatt losses wouldn't be ridulous
in comparison.  The world system isn't like a power line, it's like a
worldwide power grid, so we need to compare it to at least the USA power
grid."
	As I recall Tesla wasn't talking about very many megawatts
(megahorsepower?).
Ed