[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 7.1Hz, how the heck did Tesla succeed?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 7.1Hz, how the heck did Tesla succeed?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:45:12 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:16:22 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <8zLRHC.A.pjE.FVZ2CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Charles Brush <cfbrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi all,
Much of this discussion has focused on EM transmission theory but it always
seemed to me that Tesla was focused more on electric or electrostatic
fields rather than magnetic fields. There is a very interesting web page
authored by Oliver Nichelson that talks in depth about this, and he makes a
pretty good case for an electrostatic induction based system. No idea if
it is any more workable that EM, but it seems fit more with what Telsa was
describing (giant terminals, very high potentials, non-Hertzian, etc.):
http://prometheus.al.ru/phisik/wireless.htm
I'd be interested in hearing any comments on this.
Zap!
Charles Brush
http://www.ElectricMuseum.com