[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (no subject)
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: (no subject)
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:04:17 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:05:18 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <hPUXIB.A.p1B.b1BzCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Bert Hickman <bert.hickman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
Hi All,
Does anyone know of a sound reason why the secondary coil form
cannot/should not extend upward through the toroid so that the toroid
fits around it like a fat ring on a finger?
I would prefer not to cut this 6" x 72" clear acrylic pipe at this time.
Matt D.
Matt,
If the PMMA coil form extends significantly above the toroid, you may
encounter a problem with sparks forming and tracking along the outer
surface of the coil form above the toroid. The higher dielectric constant
of the PMMA (~3.6) causes significant E-field enhancement at the point
where the toroid, air, and PMMA all come together. Corona and sliding
discharges (along the PMMA surface) may then want to originate at this
"triple point". However, offsetting this is the overall shielding effect of
the rest of the toroid, so you may not encounter this problem. Try it and
let us know! :^)
Best regards,
Bert
-