[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Theory acceptance- Displacement current?
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Theory acceptance- Displacement current?
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:55:15 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:58:06 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <mx-fsB.A.qmB.sQYxCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Dave,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 1. heinäkuuta 2005 06:50
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Theory acceptance- Displacement current?
>
> Original poster: "David Thomson" <dwt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<SNIP>
> Be more honest. This list is not interested in new theories
> that can make better Tesla coils, unless they are
> improvements on the old theory. There is an absolute dislike
> on this list for anything new.
This is really not true! Coiling business has changed so much during the
last years. Both regarding construction techniques and architectures, as
for modelling and analysis of the phenomena involved. And it looks like the
pace is only getting faster. We are ready to embrace anything that improves
TC performance, whatever it is based on. Cheese electrons or flying saucers
don't make a difference.
The basic, simple and plain way to defend your new theories and gain new
support is always the same. Provide a documented and repeatable experiment
based on them and everybody will be satisfied (could it be more simple)?
Failing in doing so and answering to this request with silence or
theoretical exercises won't help you to make your point.
Regards