[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Low Impedance Negative Resistance Tesla Coils
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Low Impedance Negative Resistance Tesla Coils
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:00:51 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:00:52 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <IgS5BD.A.8LG.ypw-BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: stork <stork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
No, "couteracting" the resistance in the entire antenna. It's an antenna
(TC secondary) effect. It's a negative resistance feed back to the entire
secondary. Not, just a feed back to the switch in a CW coil.
One of the factors that limits antenna current is the ohmic resistance of
the tuned detector tank circuit and the antenna wire itself. Regeneration
is a means of increasing antenna current by counteracting the resistance of
the entire antenna circuit. By the introduction of what might be called
negative resistance through the addition of a feedback loop, antenna-field
interaction is increased and energy is absorbed from a greater area of the
incoming wave front.
I'm sure you mean that the DC resistance is "compensated" not eliminated.
To a certain extent, this is what a CW coil is.. since an oscillator is just
something with a bit more feedback than would be needed to compensate
forthe losses in the system.
stork