[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How (does) voltage rise(s?).
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: How (does) voltage rise(s?).
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:48:21 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:48:37 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <lnDjUD.A.KnE.kgz7BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "David Trimmell" <humanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi, John that's a good question! I have used relatively 'loose' coupling of
.15-.2 are folks using greater than this? I have only been able to get 33"
sparks with a 6" coil and a half-bridge. I use long on times and long off
time compared to others that have posted their results. Due to noise issues
I have tried to simulate a VTTC as they really can be silent, but still my
SSTC can sound like staccato gun fire! I won't be working on it till after I
get back from Panama, but will try higher coupling and a full-bridge!
Regards,
David Trimmell
-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:51 AM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: How (does) voltage rise(s?).
Original poster: FutureT@xxxxxxx
In a message dated 1/17/05 10:54:12 AM Eastern Standard Time,
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>The relation between coupling and racing sparks doesn't seem
>to hold for any kind of SSTCs I have seen, so we use tighter couplings on
>these.
Steve,
What's the actual coupling coefficient figure used on DRSSC's
these days? I've been hearing a lot about the tight couplings used,
but I don't think I remember seeing an actual number.
Thanks,
John