[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wireless Transmission
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Wireless Transmission
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:50:28 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:50:29 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <WuwqGB.A.2iF.kRk5BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx
Was Tesla proposing non-Hertzian wave transmission or non
Hertzian-wave transmission?
i.e. ~Hertzian (wave-transmission) or ~(Hertzian-wave) transmission. The
second case is the transmission of power without using EM waves, thereby
avoiding the inverse square problems of radiation loss. At least, this
seems to be the method put forth in his U.S.Pats. 645,576 and 649,621.
where he claims to use "true atmospheric conduction" rather than EM
radiation. The problem of a 15-mile high antenna wire is still
insurmountable, as all existing materials would self-destruct from their
own weight, although a fiber of carbon nanotubes might come close, Add to
this the shearing forces and whipping stresses by existing winds up to
80,000 ft. and no, the materials to build such "antennas" which did not
exist in Tesla's time, still do not exist. If such a device did exist for
global power transmission, it would, of course, disrupt all existing RF
communication systems worldwide. :-((( All Tesla was able to demonstrate
was that IF such a system could ever be built, there was reason to believe
that transmission by conduction rather than radiation through air at a
pressure of ~130 mmHg was feasible in principle.
Matt D.