[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Parallel resonant DRSSTC
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Parallel resonant DRSSTC
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:51:26 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:53:21 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <hI_iUD.A.i7.t9c3BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Mccauley, Daniel H" <daniel.h.mccauley@xxxxxxxx>
Operation of a DRSSTC is somewhat different.
Remember, that most of the energy during a DRSSTC cycle comes from the
DC Bus capacitor, not the primary
tank capacitor. So even in parallel resonant operation (and i haven't
looked into seeing if that would work
or not), you will still have the same peak currents in the switching
devices. The primary tank circuit
is primarily to create a very low impedance as seen by the driver. (e.g.
at resonance approached zero impedance)
Dan
>Hi all,
>
>I was curious if anyone has ever tried designing a DRSSTC
>using a capacitor
>in parallel with the primary rather than in series with it. If
>something
>like that could work it would have a big advantage that the
>extreamly high
>primary current would be between the capacitor and primary,
>and there would
>be almost no current throgh the switching devices.
>
>Has anyone ever thought of something like this, or played with
>the idea
>with simulation software?
>
>What would be the disadvantage of something like that?
>
>Sue
>
>
>