[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Water probe: improvements
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Water probe: improvements
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 07:55:39 -0700
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:02:51 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <AkUa1.A.7rG.aAr2BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Bob,
> I checked it is correct, Assuming that the problem is C and
> R ratio differences.
> No simple way to determine what the corner frequency of the
> lead lag terms are.
Lead lag?
> You could do it experimentally and adjust the hf boost until
> the initial rise height is correct then fiddle with the
> corner frequencies until you get the best flat top after the
> rise. There will be quadratic terms which inevitably you
> can not compensate perfectly for with 1st order lead lags
> but they may be small or at a much higher frequency.
Hf boost? Can you please explain these terms?
> Can you do a complex FFT on the step response to get the
> frequency response?
> The signal does not look very clean for it.
I could do that if I get the disk drive of that old LeCroy scope to
work. Or if I change scope. We'll get to that phase soon.
Best Regards