Re: Terry's New Plane Wave Antenna

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: "Dmitry (father dest)" <dest@xxxxxxxxxxx>


probably you missed one post, coz probably i post too much last time -
i would fix that soon :-)

> Original poster: Terry Fritz <vardin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> The etched pattern may serve no use other than "looking" cool ;-)

does it look like a snowflake? merry xmas to you then <:oD

> I have never seen any net
> charging on the antenna's or anything "odd" going on like that.

>>how can you see anything, if you eventually short C2 with 1M of scope
>>input resistance?

>>>> 1,000,000 ohms is not a "short" ;-))

hey - we were talkin about the "net charging" - almost dc in result!
for that case 1,ooo,ooo ohms is quite enough to discharge C2 quickly :p

>>how can you see anything, if C2 is about 487805 times bigger than C3?

> If the input voltage is 250kV, the voltage to the scope is about 0.5
> volts.  The scope goes down to 0.001V/div so no problem seeing the
> signal!  The input signal has a very good S/N ratio (signal to noise)
> so the waveforms look fine.

heck, i was wrong - 4v that Richard mentioned will be just at C2,
NOT at the divider input, sorry %-)

-----
Let the bass kick! =:-D