[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Kill-A-Watt vs. analog wattmeter
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Kill-A-Watt vs. analog wattmeter
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:41:30 -0600
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:46:39 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <obcg2D.A.XcB.otJFDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Steve Conner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi all,
A while back I wrote about how I thought
Kill-A-Watt-type wattmeters could give inaccurate
readings when used with SSTCs. I recently found a
Kill-A-Watt type thing for sale in the UK, so I bought
one to test. (Maplin part no. L61AQ, costs 9.99 GBP)
http://www.maplin.co.uk/images/Full/38343i0.jpg
It's made in China by the Prodigit Co. which if I
remember right is the same company responsible for the
original Kill-A-Watt. I opened it and inside was a
microcontroller plus some chip that I guess is an A/D
converter.
I set up the DRSSTC, and ran the mains feed to it
through the Prodigit meter, in series with my old
Crompton Parkinson 2-coil wattmeter. This is totally
air-cored so shouldn't be affected by high crest
factors.
http://www.scopeboy.com/tesla/drsstc/experiment/meterundertest.jpg
I then fired up the coil to a reasonable power and the
results were:
Analog meter read "150" which is 750w since you
multiply the reading by 5.
Prodigit meter read 746w, 1140VA, 6A RMS, pf=0.62
The low power factor means that the DRSSTC was drawing
awful peak currents, but the two meters still agreed
well. I conclude that the Prodigit wattmeter sold by
Maplin works fine for Tesla coiling. It also seems to
be fairly resistant to RFI, although I didn't let the
coil arc to ground heavily.
Steve Conner