[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Passive Ballasting for DRSSTC - My thoughts before Ed Wingates Teslathon
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Passive Ballasting for DRSSTC - My thoughts before Ed Wingates Teslathon
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:00:32 -0600
- Delivered-to: chip@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:03:21 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <sV31bD.A.OQG.RdTEDB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Daniel McCauley" <dhmccauley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Good responses. Thanks
Anyways, let me know if you can reproduce this passive ballast effect with
your coil. It'll be nice to get
an independent experimenter testing some of this. Cause, maybe all the
toxic waste out here in NJ has some
strange electromagnetic effect or something on the coils.
Dan
> But I am thinking of pulling you passive ballasting into the active
> limiting world also to "help out"... So it is not a matter of
> "Active Limiting vs. Passive Limiting" but rather Active Limiting
> "AND" Passive Limiting to achieve the final goal of a DRSSTC that
> just can't be blown up :-))
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry
>
>
> >Dan