[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aircraft and lightning
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Aircraft and lightning
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 16:58:09 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:02:44 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <U4j5lB.A.s3E.TGU9CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"<http://www-frd.fsl.noaa.gov/mab/microburst/micro_course.html>http://www-frd.fsl.noaa.gov/mab/microburst/micro_course.html
>
http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/people/journals/aero/coppenbarger/micro.html
-----
Looks like I'll have to double-check credibility of my
references or consult them with more care;)
Indeed,offical reports on the incidentss rejected
lightning to be the cause (becouse no evidences of
in-flight fire,explosion,or lightning strike were"
The "black box" flight recorders showed unmistakable evidence of a
typical microburst incident as the cause of the accident. Approaching
the field there is a headwind and updraft as the plane enters the edge
of the downwash; typical pilot reaction would be to nose down and reduce
power. Unfortunately, immediately after there is a tailwind and
downdraft and the crew is often unable to recover before hitting the
ground. New avoidance procedures involve keeping power on and flying
constant attitude.
Ed