[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Teslas Ball Lightning
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Teslas Ball Lightning
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 18:54:52 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 20:22:28 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <9Ho4NB.A.dtE.i7B9CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"The barometric pressure there is reported to be 30.43 inches but they
"fudge" those numbers to agree with lower elevation numbers. I don't
know why... I think it is really about 25 inches...
http://www.usairnet.com/weather/maps/colorado/pressure/
http://www.usairnet.com/weather/maps/texas/pressure/
http://www.ambientweather.com/sebaprco.html
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/wstdatmo.htm
Cheers,
Terry"
If you're talking about the pressure reported for aeronautical
purposes, it's really the baro pressure setting for the altimeters to
read correct altitude above ground, so it wouldn't be expected to vary
with station altitude per se. I wouldn't be surprised if meterological
people have the same practice.
Ed