[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:35:08 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <vardin@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:35:59 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <wSkaLC.A.yzF.-iT8CB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Denicolai, Marco" <Marco.Denicolai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Antonio,
That would be the Peek formula, right? That's for calculating the
visual corona inception Efield and it is used in many papers as the
minimum constraint for starting a streamer.
P.S. I'll be on vacation for the next 8 days, so TTYL :)
----------
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wed 8/3/2005 6:26 AM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 20 joules at 100 bps vs 4 joules at 500 bps
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
>The 30 kv/cm is for electric field. If the geometry is not two parallel
>plates, breakdown occurs when the electric field somewhere hits this
>value. I have the exact formula for two ideal spheres implemented in
>the Inca program.