[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: An internal primary
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: An internal primary
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:44:13 -0600
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Old-return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Resent-date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:45:05 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <_JIaXD.A.X6B.jbuYCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Malcolm Watts" <m.j.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 15 Apr 2005, at 11:52, Tesla list wrote:
> Original poster: "Daniel A. Kline" <daniel_kline@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:54 PM
> > To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: An internal primary
> > Original poster: Ed Phillips <evp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > "So, a bipolar coil could maybe have an internal primary...?
> > Dan K."
> > How, pray tell, would you bring the connections out through the >
> secondary? > > Ed
> Yeah...I thought of that later on. *laugh*
> Thanks for the reply.
> Dan K.
You could build the secondary in two halves, mount the primary using
holes near the bottom of one half to bring the leads out, then bond
the secondaries together. I see doing it as being far from
impossible. The secondaries do not have to have their base ends
nested right up to each other. In fact a gap may be required to
obtain a suitable coupling constant.